Casey,

Would things implemented this way be a better way to automate these flows (
built in error handling and checking as standards ) and not just for a user
at the terminal?

On September 24, 2016 at 19:02:59, Casey Stella ([email protected]) wrote:

Sorry, I meant to ask if anyone had feedback or thoughts.
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 18:35 Casey Stella <[email protected]> wrote:

> Grok-based parsers are an important part of Metron and Grok is an
> extremely adaptable, if complex, language for specifying structure in
data.
>
>
> Right now, the flow is generally:
>
> 1. Get some sample data
> 2. Use an online utility to test grok statements
> 3. upload grok statement to HDFS
> 4. restart parser topology
>
> Given the demo around managing stellar transformations inside of the
REPL,
> I began to think that it might be a more coherent and integrated
experience
> to manage grok inside of the REPL.
>
> This would involve stellar functions to
>
> - test grok statements
> - read grok statements from HDFS
> - push grok statements to HDFS
>
> I made a few JIRAs to outline it here
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-454>.
>

Reply via email to