At present we do not have a formal convention. Many organizations will no doubt want to create their own conventions to match existing naming methodologies.
However, it seems like an excellent idea to at least produce some community driven recommendations for a standard baseline those without strong existing methods could adopt. I like your vendor-product approach, but would consider adding something around model / series / version to that. Does anyone have any thoughts on how such a taxonomy would work best? Simon > On 5 Oct 2016, at 18:22, Vladimir Shlyakhtin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi > > Does Metron have any recommendation for name convention for parsers? Like > vendor-product. > > Thanks > > - Vladimir
