The format should be compatible/optimal with spark and Zeppelin.  Perhaps other 
interactive BI tools like Tableau.

Thanks
Carolyn




On 10/11/16, 1:06 PM, "Nick Allen" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Right.  The original idea is to do batch analytics.  Kind of difficult to
>work with data sitting in an ES index. But if we get a better understanding
>of the type of batch analytics, it might get us closer to the target.
>
>On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:03 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm somewhat ignorant here, never having used the MaaS stuff yet, but isn't
>> that the dataset that the models would run against?  I understand there
>> could be additional use cases, I just wanted to be clear.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:01 PM Nick Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > I don't think we put much thought into how exactly the data should be
>> > landed in HDFS and for what use cases.  It just has not been a priority.
>> >
>> > That being said, this might be a good time to gather everyone's thoughts
>> on
>> > how they would use that kind of data and for what purposes.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Owen O'Malley <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Be careful of using compressed JSON, since it isn't splittable. JSON is
>> > > also very slow for reading.
>> > >
>> > > .. Owen
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Casey Stella <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I'd also tack on to this that the configuration for the hdfs writer
>> > > should
>> > > > be moved to zookeeper rather than done in flux, IMO
>> > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 07:20 Otto Fowler <[email protected]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > The storage format and retrieval from that format should be
>> > > configurable,
>> > > > > that is a ‘boundary’ for Metron so to speak.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On October 10, 2016 at 16:15:12, [email protected] (
>> [email protected])
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Is there a specific reason why the JSON files stored in HDFS are
>> not
>> > > > > compressed? I looked for some related JIRAs and mail conversations
>> > but
>> > > > > couldn't find this already mentioned. I'm wondering if there was a
>> > good
>> > > > > enough of an argument to keep things uncompressed, or if the
>> subject
>> > > just
>> > > > > hadn't been broached yet.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Jon
>> > > > > --
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Jon
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Nick Allen <[email protected]>
>> >
>> --
>>
>> Jon
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Nick Allen <[email protected]>

Reply via email to