Yeah, I can agree with that. I believe the procedure for this is to vote on the bylaws change and a simple majority of the PMC members is required to ratify.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:27 PM, James Sirota <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Guys, any thoughts on this? > > 11.11.2016, 16:50, "James Sirota" <[email protected]>: > > going through the Apache Maturity Model we have to respond to the > following point: > > > > CS40In Apache projects, vetoes are only valid for code commits and are > justified by a technical explanation, as per the Apache voting rules > defined in CS30. > > > > The voting section of our bylaws does not currently explicitly define > this: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Apache+Metron+Bylaws > > > > I propose to add the following bullet point to the Voting section of our > bylaws: > > > > - Vetoes are only valid for code commits and are justified by a > technical explanation > > > > This way we are unambiguously covered with regards to this point upon > our review during graduation > > > > What do you think? > > > > ------------------- > > Thank you, > > > > James Sirota > > PPMC- Apache Metron (Incubating) > > jsirota AT apache DOT org > > ------------------- > Thank you, > > James Sirota > PPMC- Apache Metron (Incubating) > jsirota AT apache DOT org >
