Awesome. Thanks, guys!

-Kyle

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Casey Stella <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, when committed, close it and make it Next + 1.
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Nick Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I saw just today that someone added a "Next + 1" version to the JIRA.  I
> > started using that assuming that it was created to solve that problem.
> > Open to correction though.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Michael Miklavcic <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > To the first question, mark the Jira as DONE. I don't believe we can do
> > fix
> > > version until the community agrees on the next version increment, which
> > we
> > > normally won't know until we're getting close to cutting a release and
> > can
> > > make an assessment of it being major or minor.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Kyle Richardson <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > What's our current process for closing JIRAs once the github PR has
> > been
> > > > merged? Are we setting it to Done with a particular fix version?
> > > >
> > > > If a JIRA is a duplicate, are we marking it any particular way?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Kyle
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nick Allen <[email protected]>
> >
>

Reply via email to