Eh, I just realized my comment on RE40 is wrong. We are adding RPM-building
tools, but we do not currently release built RPMs as part of our releases. (I
hope this will change :-) So James’s original response is correct, at least
for now. Sorry.
On 1/20/17, 10:15 AM, "Matt Foley" <mfo...@hortonworks.com on behalf of
ma...@apache.org> wrote:
James, looks great overall. A few nits, and two fixes:
CD10 – “under under” – de-dup.
CD30 – “is can be” - delete “is”
CD50 – “First, is” – “is” should be “it is”
LC50 – This doesn’t exactly answer the question. It is a question about
copyright, not licensing. (eg, see the NOTICE files in github)
A better response would be:
“We document copyrights of all included source code in compliance with
Apache licensing standards.”
RE40 – It is not correct that we don’t distribute convenience binaries. We
are in the process of adding RPMs to the sub-components that don’t already have
them. A better response would be:
“Although we do provide convenience binaries for some parts of the project
releases, (a) each release can be fully built from sources and used without
reference to the convenience binaries, and (b) the convenience binaries are
documented to not be warranted or guaranteed in any way.”
It might be advisable to check the documentation to confirm (b).
QU30 – “identified addressed” – insert “and”
“the Metron's” – delete “the”
QU50 – “Metorn” – should be “Metron”
Thanks,
--Matt
On 1/20/17, 9:38 AM, "James Sirota" <jsir...@apache.org> wrote:
Guys,
I went through the Apache Project Maturity document and documented how
Metron meets each of these criteria. My draft is available here. What do you
guys think? Anything you would like to add/revise about this?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=66852119
-------------------
Thank you,
James Sirota
PPMC- Apache Metron (Incubating)
jsirota AT apache DOT org
