Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/438#discussion_r100395910
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-enrichment/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/threatintel/triage/ThreatTriageProcessor.java
---
@@ -52,15 +74,36 @@ public ThreatTriageProcessor( SensorEnrichmentConfig
config
@Nullable
@Override
- public Double apply(@Nullable Map input) {
- List<Number> scores = new ArrayList<>();
+ public ThreatScore apply(@Nullable Map input) {
+
+ ThreatScore threatScore = new ThreatScore();
StellarPredicateProcessor predicateProcessor = new
StellarPredicateProcessor();
+ StellarProcessor processor = new StellarProcessor();
VariableResolver resolver = new MapVariableResolver(input,
sensorConfig.getConfiguration(), threatIntelConfig.getConfig());
+
+ // attempt to apply each rule to the threat
for(RiskLevelRule rule : threatTriageConfig.getRiskLevelRules()) {
if(predicateProcessor.parse(rule.getRule(), resolver,
functionResolver, context)) {
- scores.add(rule.getScore());
+
+ // add the rule's score to the overall threat score
+ String reason = execute(rule.getReason(), processor, resolver,
String.class);
+ RuleScore score = new RuleScore(rule, reason);
+ threatScore.addRuleScore(score);
}
}
- return threatTriageConfig.getAggregator().aggregate(scores,
threatTriageConfig.getAggregationConfig());
+
+ // calculate the aggregate threat score
+ Aggregators aggregators = threatTriageConfig.getAggregator();
+ List<Number> allScores =
threatScore.getRuleScores().stream().map(score ->
score.getRule().getScore()).collect(Collectors.toList());
+ Double aggregateScore = aggregators.aggregate(allScores,
threatTriageConfig.getAggregationConfig());
+
+ // return the overall threat score
+ threatScore.setScore(aggregateScore);
+ return threatScore;
+ }
+
+ private <T> T execute(String expression, StellarProcessor processor,
VariableResolver resolver, Class<T> clazz) {
+ Object result = processor.parse(expression, resolver,
functionResolver, context);
--- End diff --
Honestly, I am not aware enough of the underpinnings to give a good
suggestion. My immediate thought is caching the parsed version of the rule,
and only parsing if we don't have it.
@cestella Any thoughts on if this causes potential performance issues and
if caching is a) possible and b) useful here?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
