Github user nickwallen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/449 I think what I mean is a little different (but maybe I've missed your point.) For example, when @james-sirota first reviewed this PR he was confused why we would send data to Kafka. He thought it was a replacement for HBase, rather than an addition to that. His mistake was totally understandable. Using terms like 'kafka' and 'hbase', forces the user to under why they would want to send profile data to HBase and why they would want to send profile data to Kafka. It forces the user to know the implementation. But I am saying that users should not need to know the implementation details of the Profiler. They should just tell us if they want the profile data stored for later and whether they want to triage the data from the Profiler. So I am suggesting that to be "user focused" we use terms that focus on the functionality from the user's perspective, not terms based on how we've implemented the Profiler. A user would tell us to 'triage' or not; they would not tell us 'kafka' or not.
--- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---