I’ve copied it to the cwiki, but the thing is that cwiki only allows comments at the bottom. With a long doc like this, that’s not very good. I’d much rather keep everyone’s comments in the same system, and local to the text they’re commenting on.
Is it okay to leave this in google doc? If anyone can’t abide logging in to google, the cwiki version is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Extracting+Stellar+into+an+Independent+Module Thanks, --Matt On 4/11/17, 3:15 PM, "Matt Foley" <mfo...@hortonworks.com> wrote: No, actually you’re right. Will have it moved over shortly. On 4/11/17, 2:56 PM, "Otto Fowler" <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> wrote: Nevermind On April 11, 2017 at 17:47:57, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: Can’t we do this in confluence? On April 11, 2017 at 17:38:40, Matt Foley (ma...@apache.org) wrote: Hi all, This is a new discussion thread, and if the proposed change is accepted by the community, it will be submitted to the next release, not the current 0.4.0 branch. Stellar has 126 verbs today, and seems only likely to continue growing. Furthermore, we expect Stellar to be extended by users, and probably grow into having one or more Registry/ Repositories, etc. All this suggests that we should start viewing Stellar itself as a component, and make sure it is maintainable and has clean interfaces to the rest of the system. And that will be easier if we extract it into its own module, both in the code tree and in maven. I’ve written a combination proposal / discussion about how to extract Stellar from its current deep embed in Metron. Comments are welcome, and encouraged. Please read: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EP7Jt4ePHe2A-_oboLl2QbN1muh7uKeET_kbpIgjcJM/edit#heading=h.4vsrmths49wk I believe I’ve set access so anyone can read and comment on it. However, google docs may still ask you log in with a google-registered email address. If this is a problem for anyone, let me know and I can send you a Word document. Thanks, --Matt
