Hi All The results are below. As a week has passed can we take it that this motion as carried? Is this result recorded somewhere?
For 7 Against 0 Regards Kealan On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Vladislav Mitov <[email protected] > wrote: > +1 > > Vladi > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:12 AM Kealan Mccusker < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Nick > > > > This does supersede the existing repo. It is a C repo with language > > wrappers for golang and Python. > > > > Regards > > > > Kealan > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Nick Kew <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:26:37 +0000 > > > Kealan Mccusker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi All > > > > > > > > We have a repo (below) that is currently on the Miracl GitHub account > > > > and it is part of the Apache Milagro project. For operational reasons > > > > we would like to maintain this repo on the Miracl GitHub account and > > > > make it public. Would this be be OK with the dev community? May I > > > > propose a vote? > > > > > > > > The milagro-crypto-c should remain on Miracl GitHub: me +1 > > > > > > > > https://github.com/miracl/milagro-crypto-c > > > > > > > > > > Does this replace/supersede anything in the existing > > > milagro-crypto repo? > > > > > > I've just asked informally about the status of full two-way > > > github integration, and I understand it's now being made > > > available more widely. I'm not sure where we stand as an > > > incubating project, but it's probably worth looking in > > > to putting in a request for it. > > > > > > I have a horribly busy weekend, but will take a look next > > > week if noone else gets there first. > > > > > > -- > > > Nick Kew > > > > > >
