Hi, I emailed a draft for the report, let me know if it looks ok or it needs changing (preferably send feedback to the Report Draft email, not this one). Also since NTT wishes to take over such tasks, let me know if I can help you get started submitting the reports in the future.
Thanks, Nikolai On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:39 PM Falk III, Thomas <thomas.falk....@sap.com> wrote: > -1 > > Hello everyone, > > As quiet observer of this project, I would truly like to see this project > continued as it provides a great alternative to commercial certificate > authorities (CA's) for trust. > > After the issues with Symantec (and other CA's) that came out last year, I > think we are overdue for a functional alternative, which I feel Milagro has > the potential to fill. > > > https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2018/03/12/distrust-symantec-tls-certificates/ > > Cheers, > Thomas Falk > -----Original Message----- > From: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:giorgio.zo...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 10:54 AM > To: firstname.lastname@example.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Retire Milagro > > Hello everybody, > do you have any python demos to show up? We have a Python meetup here in > BCN, i could evangelist the project to the next meetup. > Best Regards, > Giorgio. > > > 2018-04-10 10:12 GMT+02:00 Simeon Aladjem <simeon.alad...@miracl.com>: > > > -1 > > > > There is a good will to return the project to a normal track, and scope > it > > around the crypto only. > > Yes, there has been some infrastructural and procedural reasons for > > "forking" the crypto code outside Apache and commit the mass of > development > > to that fork, > > but the newest code will eventually be committed back to Apache together > > with reorganizing the repositories, which will revive the project. > > > > I believe that a little bit more time is required to figure out the tiny > > details for doing the above, as some mentor's help will be required too. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Simeon Aladjem > > > > On 10/4/18, 10:30, "Go Yamamoto" <yamamoto...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > > > Hi Nick, > > > > I agree the infrastructure problem you have pointed out have been > > blocking > > the initial commit, and it blocks everything toward the release. To > > solve > > the problem, I think all what we need is the operational management > at > > the > > official github repo. It is hard to solve the problem > technologically > > because Miracl's engineering team (and ours too) want to use CI > tools, > > and > > it means OAuth grants for access by the CI tools must be managed at > the > > repository on which they work. > > > > We NTT request to allow for contributors to work at their own fork > > repository. All the changes on the code happens at local fork > > repositories > > owned by each contributor, however, the changes at local fork will be > > pull-requested to the official repo, and the operation team at the > > official > > repo will review the pull-request and merge it to the official. > > > > If this workflow is OK for everybody here, NTT would like to take the > > effort > > of operational tasks and managements on the official repo at least > > until we > > reach the first release. > > > > I sincerely hope this proposal would contribute in resolving the > > blocker. > > Please feel free to share your concerns if any. > > > > Regards, > > Go Yamamoto > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nick Kew [mailto:n...@apache.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 8:07 AM > > To: email@example.com > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Retire Milagro > > > > On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 14:16:09 +0000 > > "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > All, > > > > > > This is a call to vote to retire the Milagro podling. > > > > +-0. Subject to change in either direction. > > > > For a long time, this project has not been happening at Apache, and > on > > that > > basis retirement seems appropriate. > > My past attempts to prod it have met with no response. > > > > On the other hand, some more promising activity has recently been > seen > > on > > this list, notably with the arrival of NTT folks and an active > > newcomer who > > I've only just realised isn't an initial committer from the Miracl > > team! > > > > I have been meaning for some time to try once more to prod it and > > would be > > reluctant to vote for retirement before doing so. > > I've been doing battle with a failing internet connection, but I've > now > > parted company with the ISP in question. > > So hopefully I'll now be fine to review all list traffic since  > and > > post > > thoughts within 24 hours. > > > > > Here are the documented problems: > > > > > > - Development does not happen at Apache. This is confirmed in > > changes > > > like  where you are trying to repoint mirrors away from the > Apache > > > hosted repository into a Miracl hosted repository. > > > > At the time the repos were created, there was an issue with folks > > being less > > than happy with the level of github integration then available. I > > touched > > on this in , but should no doubt have been clearer. IF THERE ARE > > INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES HOLDING THINGS BACK, THE TEAM NEEDS TO SPEAK > UP! > > > > > - No board report submitted for months. > > > > Indeed, someone from the team needs to take responsibility. > > In the early days I did too much of this myself, but it's not > supposed > > to be > > a mentor task! > > > >  Most recently > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/milagro-dev/ > > 201711.mbox/%3C15102433 > > 30.26629.45.camel%40mimir.webthing.com%3E > > > > -- > > Nick Kew > > > > > > > > > -- Nikolai Stoilov NOC/Support Team Lead MIRACL