+1 On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 11:38 +0900, Trustin Lee wrote: > On 11/21/06, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > peter royal wrote: > > > On Nov 16, 2006, at 7:42 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote: > > >> I know some MINA commiter (most?) don't like the current code formating > > >> rules inherited from ADS. It could make integration of patch and > > >> contributors easier. > > >> > > >> So perhaps we can change to std java formating rules for trunk (2.0) ? > > > > > > I'd be happy to use something closer to the standard java rules. > > > - > > Me too. I think that Sun's cod conventions > > (http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/) is the most widely used out there. > > Switching to something closer to those rules would definitely make it > > easier for MINA users to submit patches and easier for us to apply them. > > > > Though as long as I have Eclipse's Ctrl+Shift+F I'll get by. :) > > > It seems like at least four committers including me wants the Java standard > coding convention. Then what do you think about applying the new formatting > in trunk from now on? We could reformat one by one when we have something > to commit. Here are the Eclipse formatter setting files: > > http://mina.apache.org/developer-guide.html#DeveloperGuide-CodingConvention > > Trustin
