Le vendredi 12 janvier 2007 à 09:18 +0000, peter ellis a écrit : > To be honest the who naming convention here for example.... > > Interface WriteFuture > Interface CloseFuture > > Just seems odd to me why not have then WriteAsync and CloseAsync ???? > I was speaking with one of the C++ developers and showed him the code > of which he explained to me what it must be doing: joining, waiting > etc. but he agreed that the naming convention they (Mina) have used is > a tad well stupid ..."future"!???? WTF > > What I will say though is YOU have told me more than what the > documentation tells me
It's named after this J2SE interface : http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/Future.html You should have asked to a java developper :) Julien
