Monajit, Looking at the current http://mina.apache.org/testimonials.html might help you to worry less about the performance of mina :-)
30 messages per second and 300-400 simultaneous connections won't be a big problem for MINA itself, I guess. Of course, it depends on the size of the messages, the complexity of the protocol and the logic that has to be done by 'the back-end'. We can easily do 300 messages per second, and the botlleneck isn't MINA but the (oracle) database. Other people have reported far more impressive results with MINA. regards, Maarten On 3/6/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/6/07, Monajit Choudhury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi > I understand that and I apologize. But I got desperate. We are > embarking on this huge project and counting on MINA big time. But this > error was a big hurdle in designing the prototype. I need the support > from u guys as we go along . To give you an estimate of what MINA has to > go through is, it has to handle some 30 msgs per sec, listen > simultaneously to some 300 to 400 ports, and ve to b fast enough to > remain unnoticed as a proxy server. :). No problem at all, Monajit :) Sometime, it's good to be able to express desesperation... Next time, your message will be smoother, because : 1) you won't be so desesperate and, 2) you now know about the etiquette ;) Fell free to post mails to the list, it's always a pleasure (and also an advantage) to help users. The more problems users have, the more bug they found, the better will be the product and the documentation. Very glad that your problem has been solved :) Maybe you may consider to post a testimony when your project is over, to explain what you have used Mina for, and how you successfully implemented it. Mina team is very found of testimony (and of happy users, too :) ! Emmanuel -- Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
