Sorry about that. Here it is again.
-----Original Message----- From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: testing mina Sorry, I did not get any attachment.. On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Here it is. Replace the sumup client with this client , jar up and dump > the jar in jmeter/lib/ext dir.I am sending you a sample testplan( > JavaRequest.jmx) too. Just open it with jmeter and you will be good to go. > > Regds > Monajit > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:20 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: testing mina > > sure. I'd take a look at it. Do you have the jmeter config file as well? > > Thanks. > > On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ya the spine graph or whatever takes time refreshing. What I use is the > > aggregate graph.It does the job for me.Its simple and lays down the > result > > in a tabular format.I have modified the sumup client to work as a Jmeter > > sampler and it worked pretty neat.If you need I can send the file to > you. > > > > Regds > > Monajit > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 11:05 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: testing mina > > > > I just don't understand the graphing of jmeter. Some people get nice > > pretty > > graphs, and I just seem to get garbled graphs that look meaningless. > > The other problem I have with jmeter is that to extend jmeter takes much > > more work that I think is necessary. I tried to write an SMTP send > tester > > and it took forever and still did not work. > > > > > > On 3/8/07, Monajit Choudhury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I tried grinder, but its not as versatile as jmeter. I would go for > > > Jmeter. I have done some loadtesting of the MINA examples thru jmeter > it > > did > > > pretty well. > > > > > > Regds > > > Monajit > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: James Im [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 10:05 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: testing mina > > > > > > another testing tool: Grinder > > > > > > http://grinder.sourceforge.net/ > > > > > > Mark Webb wrote: > > > >exactly. > > > > > > > >I think we should agree on a test tool and write test plans that can > go > > > >into > > > >the baseline. > > > > > > > > > > > >On 3/8/07, James Im <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>Mark Webb wrote: > > > >> >What does everyone use to test the throughput/load/etc of MINA. I > > > have > > > >> >always had a love/hate relationship with jmeter, and wondered if > > > anyone > > > >> >uses > > > >> >anything else. > > > >> > > > > >> >Thank you. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >>I think that Mina should have some performance tests included so > that > > > >>code changes' impact on performance can be evaluated. > > > >> > > > >>With some tests, you can test on the previous version and the newer > > one > > > >>and see the relative difference. > > > >> > > > >>I don't answer your question I know. > > > >> > > > >>_________________________________________________________________ > > > >>Ta' pÃ¥ udsalg Ã¥ret rundt pÃ¥ MSN Shopping: http://shopping.msn.dk > > - > > > >>her > > > >>finder du altid de bedste priser > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Del dine store filer uden problemer på MSN Messenger: > > > http://messenger.msn.dk/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ..Cheers > > Mark > > > > > > > -- > ..Cheers > Mark > > > -- ..Cheers Mark
