I agree with Ashish. This provides the most flexibility.
On 5/5/07, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/5/07, Ashish Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i think have a constant size header which will contain payload length > for rest of message. I agree, this is very easy to implement. On 5/5/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can anyone help me out with my protocol design? Is it better to design > > protocol as a fixed length or non fixed length? What I meant is fixed > lenght > > message(for instance 512bytes) for each message? Non fixed length means > the > > message size could be big. Which method is better? If fixed length, i > faced > > a problem. How to reassembly the message since message is cut into the > > piece? > > >
-- ..Cheers Mark
