On May 15, 2007, at 11:22 PM, Trustin Lee wrote:
I was reviewing DefaultIoFuture implementation in 1.1 which used CountDownLatch and AtomicBoolean, and found a possible bug. Please verify my idea.
I think you're right. Might just be safest to use synchronization on the two methods to keep them from being executed in parallel?
-pete -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
