On May 24, 2007, at 8:45 AM, Adam Fisk wrote:
The slides were just posted from this Java One session claiming Grizzly blows MINA away performance-wise, and I'm just curious as to people's viewson it. They present some interesting ideas about optimizing selector threading and ByteBuffer use.http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/j1sessn.jsp? sessn=TS-2992&yr=2007&track=5
I just read over that this morning..Without really knowing more details, my first blush is that on HTTP, Grizzly is probably faster due to the fact that it was initially tuned for HTTP. We know that MINA has extra latency wrt accepting connections, so that's a definite spot that grizzly can beat us out at.
MINA was designed to be protocol agnostic from day one, whereas Grizzly was designed for HTTP. (They have been working to remove the HTTP-centric nature of the design from what I read on their blogs, and their 1.5 release has easy support for doing any kind of protocol now)
-pete -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
