On 5/24/07, Adam Fisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The slides were just posted from this Java One session claiming Grizzly
blows MINA away performance-wise, and I'm just curious as to people's views
on it. They present some interesting ideas about optimizing selector
threading and ByteBuffer use.
http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/j1sessn.jsp?sessn=TS-2992&yr=2007&track=5
Maybe someone could comment on the performance improvements in MINA 2.0? It
might also be useful to look at Grizzlies techniques to see if MINA could
incorporate them. I know at least Scott Oaks from Grizzly is a solid
performance guy, so their numbers are likely correct.
Quick note: I'm not trying to spark a Grizzly/MINA battle by any means. I
just started using MINA after having implemented several generic NIO
frameworks myself, and I absolutely love MINA's approach. It allowed me to
code a STUN server in 2 days, and I'm porting my SIP server now.
Thanks,
Adam
Still benchmarks presented in that document seems contradicting
Trustin's benchmarks. In the presentation it says Grizzly with Async
web is just a little faster than a "C based web server " but almost
two times faster and scalable than Mina.But Trustin's test also shows
that Mina based Async Web server is a little faster than a C based
Server (Apache HTTP) so there is something fishy going on here..
If only we had a wider benchmark suite which tests for different
types of protocols and loads, instead of microbenchmarks.
Mehmet
