[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ravinder Singh updated DIRMINA-334:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: ExecutorFilter.java
Hi Trustin,
I have made some changes in ExecutorFilter.java class to handle parallel
processing, but I think we need to put that code in some other class, say, a
sub-class of "ExecutorFilter" and let the user specify a flag (in
SocketAcceptorConfig ), to indicate if parallel processing is required.
Depending on that initialize the appropriate executor filter class. This is
just a design suggestion, may be you can think of a better alternative.
Thanks,
> Add an option that disables event ordering in ExecutorFilter.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRMINA-334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-334
> Project: MINA
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Trustin Lee
> Assignee: Trustin Lee
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0-M1
>
> Attachments: ExecutorFilter.java
>
>
> Some applications don't need to receive events in order, but need to process
> events more simultaneously for performance. ExecutorFilter could provide an
> option that disables event ordering for such applications.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
