On 6/12/07, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds like the community has spoken and this is a great thing even though I personally perferred to develop it at Directory. Yet I understand that others want to have this distinct and it should be. I'm sure we can leverage whatever DNS libraries are produced by this project to have an LDAP backed store integrated into ApacheDS. Futhermore those involved at Directory can participate in the effort if they would like to so it's a win win situation. ...
Count me in and it sounds from Alex' comments that we would likely have support from the Directory PMC to contribute code. A solid DNS provider with upstream support is part of our "realm control" goals and it has been slow going. A revitalized effort around messages, codecs, and asynch client-side would really help Directory get to a DNS provider faster, with more supported record types, upstream support, and zone transfer. Enrique
