On 6/20/07, Mark Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this is great information. I would like to see some test cases that
support your information. In addition to the test cases, what
environment/IDE are you performing this research on?
Thanks and great work!
I think Gaston's comment is correct; ConcurrentHashMap takes up much
more memory than sychronized hashmap. We employed ConcurrentHashMap
for better concurrency, but we need balance between memory consumption
considering how concurrently the attributes will be accessed. I guess
most applications won't need concurrent hash map.
WDYT? Shall we revert back to HashMap?
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
