The ephemeral port range change and file descriptors were the big changes
that I recall. Mr. Royal from this list actually figured out the ephemeral
port problem. You can go here to see more details on it:
http://www.ncftp.com/ncftpd/doc/misc/ephemeral_ports.html
We were using an up-to-date version of Red Hat, Java 1.6, and a pre-release
of MINA 1.1. The box was a quad processor machine with 8 gigs of ram. I
don't recall exactly how much ram we had allocated but I think it was around
4 gigs. Thanks!
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: Max number of concurrent connections?
Mike,
Could you provide any more information? What OS/tweaks did you have to
do?
Thanks.
On 6/25/07, Michael Grundvig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We've tested to just over 50k on a single box. This did require tweaking
the
OS to accept that many inbound. You will need to adjust the ephemeral(sp)
ports.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: Max number of concurrent connections?
> There was talk a while back that OpenFire (
> http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/openfire/index.jsp) was getting
> over
> 30K concurrent connections
>
> On 6/25/07, James Apfel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> does somebody know or can estimate what about the maximum number of
>> concurrent connections in MINA is. Our protocol requires only little
>> bandwidth and won't max out the Network interface but the server must
>> be able to handle many concurrent clients.
>>
>> Thanks
>> James
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ..Cheers
> Mark
>
--
..Cheers
Mark
