Re: Refactor ByteBuffer for 2.0?

[peter royal]

On Jul 7, 2007, at 4:25 PM, cowwoc wrote:

I noticed you are removing pooling and acquire()/release() of ByteBuffer in 2.0. Can you please consider refactoring ByteBuffer to be a helper class

that fits on top of or alongside NIO's ByteBuffer?
...

be rewritten by a native English speaker.

Also, I don't mean to offend anyone, but the Javadoc documentation for ByteBuffer needs to

Gili, thanks for the feedback..



-pete


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi

Care to work up some patches that start on a refactoring and perhaps clean up the javadocs? :)

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature