What's the difference between listening on port 80 or other port? Can you
explain more on this one? Thanks.


On 7/21/07, Mark Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

What about a scenario where port 80 is open on the firewall, and a
malicious
person is attempting a DDoS on the server listening on port 80?

I do not think all (maybe not any) firewalls can protect against that.


On 7/20/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now I wonder whether ConnectionThrottleFilter could be done in most
> Firewall?
>
> On 7/13/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I like that idea.  I also agree with Mat and a firewall *should*
handle
> > the
> > blacklisting, but defense-in-depth is something I strongly believe in.
> >
> > On 7/11/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 7/12/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Not sure I agree.
> > > >
> > > > Blacklisting a host is analogous to a firewall operation in that
the
> > > > administrator of a MINA-based application would determine which
> hosts
> > > can
> > > > connect to the application.  The ConnectionThrottleFilter is
> designed
> > to
> > > > block host connections when they try and connect to quickly, like
in
> > the
> > > > case of a denial-of-service attack.
> > > >
> > > > I could understand combining code via a shared parent
class.  There
> > was
> > > talk
> > > > of even extending the ConnectionThrottleFilter further by keeping
a
> > host
> > > in
> > > > the 'block' list for a configurable amount of time.
> > >
> > > I think what differs is a policy.  If the policy is pre-programmed
or
> > > permanant, it's what BlacklistFilter does.  Otherwise, it's what
> > > ConnectionThrottlefilter is supposed do.  Probably we could create
> > > some generic filter that user can specify a certain policy.  For
> > > example:
> > >
> > > ConnectionThrottlePolicy p = ...;
> > > ConnectionThrottleFilter f = new ConnectionThrottleFilter(p);
> > >
> > > Trustin
> > > --
> > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > --
> > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > --
> > > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ..Cheers
> > Mark
> >
>



--
..Cheers
Mark

Reply via email to