On 8/20/07, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2007, at 2:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Renamed TransportType to IoServiceMetadata because it stands what
> > it does more precisely
>
> This name seems odd to me.. I think of a 'service' as what I'm
> providing.. and MINA makes my service available over various
> transports (TCP,UDP,in-VM, etc)
>
> I do agree about it being 'Metadata' vs 'Type' though.
>
> How about TransportMetadata?

TransportMetadata sounds good.  Then should we rename
IoService.getMetadata() to getTransportMetadata()?  We could also
resurrect IoSession.getTransportMetadata() (was: getTransportType()).
WDYT?

Trustin
-- 
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6

Reply via email to