Kevin Smeltzer wrote: > Is this a project for doing transfer through HTTP using Mina? If so it > could be very valuable (to me anyways) :-D
Yep ;-) > > On 8/27/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have been moving things around, creating the 3 separate subprojects. >> Everything is compiling and seems to be in good shape. I posted a question >> to the list a couple days ago about javadocs at the class level and have not >> heard back. Maybe your email and mine will bump this thread and someone can >> answer my question. >> >> Either way, I will check in what I have tonight. I'm on EST.... >> >> -- >> ..Cheers >> Mark >> >> On 8/27/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Any status on where we are at with this? I have patches I want to start >>> delivering ;-) >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> Mike Heath wrote: >>>> I don't want to hold up moving this code over. If/when we decide to put >>>> it on a different release schedule, moving the module over to a >>>> 'commons' repo or something similar will be trivial. So, for the time >>>> being, I would be fine if we moved asynchronous http client into MINA as >>>> a module. >>>> >>>> I'm eager to play with this client and I'm very eager to look into using >>>> it to create asynchronous web service calls. >>>> >>>> -Mike >>>> >>>> Mark wrote: >>>>> I like Trustin's three module ideas as well. I also think Mike has a >>>>> valid >>>>> concern on the release schedule. I would rather get a consensus on >>> this >>>>> before we move forward. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 8/23/07, Cameron Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> I liked Trustin's three module idea: >>>>>> >>>>>> * mina-filter-codec-http <-- common code >>>>>> * mina-protocol-server-http <-- asyncweb imported here >>>>>> * mina-protocol-client-http <-- AsyncHttpClient imported here >>>>>> >>>>>> Can it be decided later, after the import, whether it should be on >>>>>> the same release cycle as MINA!? Apache Felix has components such as >>>>>> their "commons" on a different release schedule. I think MINA could >>>>>> do the same if needed. The most important thing I think is to get the >>>>>> code imported right now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cameron >>>>>> >>>>>> On 8/23/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>> based on Mike's comments, I am not sure where we want to go with all >>>>>> this. >>>>>>> On 8/22/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>>> Mike and Mark, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I did my final commits. Feel free to grab the code. I will hold on >>>>>>>> further development until it hits the Mina repo. You can find it >>> all >>>>>>>> here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/AsyncHttpClient/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jeff >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mike Heath wrote: >>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee wrote: >>>>>>>>>> We might be able to extract common codec from both server and >>>>>> client >>>>>>>>>> side into a separate module and let two depend on it, resulting >>>>>> three >>>>>>>>>> submodules in total: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * mina-filter-codec-http >>>>>>>>>> * mina-protocol-server-http >>>>>>>>>> * mina-protocol-client-http >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wdty? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Trustin >>>>>>>>> Are you suggesting making the above sub-modules part of MINA >>>>>> itself? I >>>>>>>>> don't like this idea as stated in my previous messages. I don't >>>>>> like >>>>>>>>> tying the release of MINA to the release of HTTP protocol handlers >>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> vice versa. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I very much like the idea of extracting common functionality >>> between >>>>>> an >>>>>>>>> HTTP server and HTTP client and having both the client and server >>>>>> depend >>>>>>>>> on the common module. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> After giving it a lot of thought, I'm of the opinion more now than >>>>>> ever >>>>>>>>> that we should make async-httpclient part of AsyncWeb. They have >>>>>> too >>>>>>>>> much in common to keep them separate IMO. There's no reason that >>>>>>>>> AsyncWeb should be a server only project and IIRC, there were plans >>>>>> made >>>>>>>>> a while ago to create a client for AsyncWeb. Such a move would >>> also >>>>>>>>> give us a good incentive to finally get AsyncWeb migrated over to >>>>>> MINA. >>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Mike >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ..Cheers >>>>>>> Mark >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>
