Perhaps this could be solved in conjunction with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-428. With UDP, if the
priority is above a certain threshold we would send the packet as an
urgent data packet.
WDYT?
-Mike
minatds wrote:
You are correct about the fact that few routers support them and also many
avoid to use urgent data packets
as they can be a cause for DOS attacks. In my situation, my application act
as a gateway/router where it interacts with the legacy applications built
in Powerbuilder and Sybase/TDS complaint Mainframe applications.
The power builder application waits after sending urgent packet and the
server has to respond for that packet to continue.
So any help to get this patch, will be of great help.
Other than this, MINA rocks.
thanks a lot
Sincerely
Minatds
Adam Fisk-3 wrote:
I'm curious if you see any effect of the urgent data options. My
understanding was that few routers support them. Do you see them having
an
effect?
I'd suggest just a patch to the configuration classes to support the
option. Should be a really easy change, and I'd suspect it would be
accepted quickly. I think the change you'd want to make would be in
SocketSessionConfigImpl.
Not ideal, I realize, but I'd expect that change to get accepted really
quickly if you submit a patch, and you could run off the mainline until
the
release.
-Adam
On 8/28/07, minatds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trustin,
I am wondering whether there is any work around for sending urgent data
packet?
thanks
sincerely
minatds
minatds wrote:
Thanks Jeroen.
As I have mentioned in the earlier mails, I have enabled setOOBInline
in
my code and only after that I could detect urgent data packets.
Now I have to SEND the urgent data packets and that seems to be the
problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-send-a-urgent-data-packet-tf4231150s16868.html#a12377736
Sent from the Apache MINA Support Forum mailing list archive at
Nabble.com
.
