On 10/2/07, Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I think this is the way to go about implementing this kinds of > things. This is similar to what was suggested the last time the proxy > issue came up on the mailing list > (http://www.nabble.com/Proxy-filter-tf3880454.html).
How did you find that thread? :) > Now, one thing we should consider is whether we want to support > specifying proxyHost, proxyPort via system properties, just like Socket > does. In that case I don't think it will be as simple as wrapping like > suggested above. Maybe we could support this by having some kind of > factory which looks at the system properties? I agree with you that things will get complicated with system properties. The questions is, do we really need to support system properties? If a user uses a factory like Spring, he or she could configure proxied connection very easily. Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
