I'll take care of this this week. What should we call the module? Is
"sm" ok?
/Niklas
Trustin Lee wrote:
Looks like there's no objection. It would be nice Julien and Niklas
could move it to the trunk soon.
Cheers,
Trustin
On 10/13/07, Mike Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
I'm playing a little with MINA SM (State Machine) from Niklas sandbox
it's a very nice SM implementation and quite useful for server/protocol
implementation. I think it's time to move it in trunk as a new module.
WDYT ?
+1
