On 10/22/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any performance tradeoff by using MessageDecoder instead of > CumulativeProtocolDecoder?
There's small additional overhead determining a proper MessageDecoder; DemuxingProtocolCodecFactory iterates all registered MessageDecoders to call decodable(). However, I don't think it's a big overhead because most messages can be determined from its first few bytes. Once a proper MessageDecoder is chosen, there's no overhead. Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
