Great idea! Would be a good thing to selftest the own changes against
the values reached before. Additionally I like MINA for it's chain
concept and the several (increasing number) of "plugins", so that it
would be bad, if the people choose different frameworks only because
they are quicker.
Regards
Michael
Emmanuel Lecharny schrieb:
Hi Trustin, and team !
This comparison thread is really interesting. As many people out there
are wondering what kind of performances can be reached with MINA, in
various aspects ( throughput, number of users, etc), it would be
interesting to have a set of perfomance scenario defined and run against
different versions of MINA.
Exposing those numbers for each new version can help developper to know
if what they have added to the server has impact on performance (I was
specifically thinging about the 'logger' thread two or three weeks ago
). It can also expose the real numbers, with correct settings, instead
of what people find just by playing there own scenario on there own
computers.
Last, not least, a performance scenario with sources is very valuable to
people who want to understand how to get the best practice when writing
a server using MINA.
wdyt ?
