Thanks Mike!
I was actually expecting users to call addMessageEncoder/Decoder multiple times:
codec.addMessageEncoder(String.class, SuperMessageEncoder.class);
codec.addMessageEncoder(Date.class, SuperMessageEncoder.class);
Trustin
On Nov 9, 2007 4:58 AM, Mike Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I added some additional methods that take a j.u.Collection so you can
> specify multiple types for a single encoder. This appears to be working
> fine for one of my projects.
>
> -Mike
>
>
> gorano wrote:
> > Thanks,
> >
> > It makes sense, but the callback gave me the possibility to return a Set of
> > classes and this method only takes a single Class. Is the callback still
> > there if need comes to specify multiple classes? ..or should a method
> > signature taking a Set also be implemented.
> >
> > I guess I should go to the source and have a look my self (lazy me).
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Goran
> >
> >
> > Nicolai_Guba wrote:
> >> gorano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/11/2007 11:53:00:
> >>
> >>> Yes, it's the first param. Is it replacing the getMessageTypes()
> >> callback
> >>> inside the Message encoder, or does it have another use?
> >> Indeed, it appears that it replaces the callback. Not sure whether it has
> >> other uses...
> >>
> >>> Trustin Lee wrote:
> >>>> On 11/8/07, gorano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sorry of being lazy and not figuring this out my self.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (1)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IoSession.getAttachment is now deprecated, do I use the getAttribute
> >> with
> >>>>> a
> >>>>> key instead?
> >>>> Yes. You could use AttributeKey as a key for the best performance.
> >>>>
> >>>>> (2)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> DemuxingProtocolCodecFactory.register(...) is gone. Guess I should
> >> use
> >>>>> addMessageDecoder and addMessageEncoder instead.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> addMessageDecoder takes 2 args though
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Inside my MessageEncoder I use stuff like:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> public Set<Class<IoBuffer>> getMessageTypes(){
> >>>>> return
> >>>>> Collections.<Class<IoBuffer>>singleton(IoBuffer.class);
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is this second param replacing this in some way?
> >>>> Wasn't it the first param? For example...
> >>>>
> >>>> addMessageEncoder(String.class, StringMessageEncoder.class);
> >>>>
> >>>> HTH,
> >>>> Trustin
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>>> --
> >>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>> --
> >>>> PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Mina-2-snapshot-
> >>> changes-tf4770428s16868.html#a13645635
> >>> Sent from the Apache MINA Support Forum mailing list archive at
> >> Nabble.com.
> >>
> >> **********************************************************************
> >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> >> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> >> If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for
> >> all known viruses.
> >> Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Limited
> >> Registered Office: 10 Great Marlborough Street, London W1F 7LP, United
> >> Kingdom
> >> Registered in England: 3277793
> >> **********************************************************************
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
