How big is the task to create blocking Socket IO transport. is any one already working on it?
If I can get some guidance, I think I will work on it to develop and test it. thanks minatds Trustin Lee wrote: > > On Nov 16, 2007 3:38 PM, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Nov 15, 2007 9:34 AM, minatds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > I still have this problem where I cannot send urgent data packets. >> > In my Gateway application, I basically proxy between legacy >> applications and >> > a mainframe. >> > These legacy applications send urgent data packets for which mainframe >> sends >> > a response and >> > they use as their sync mechanism. >> > I cannot use SocketConnector as it does not implement raw Java sockets. >> > There is a defect opened in this regard. >> > >> > I am trying to find any work around for this solution. >> > >> > How can I combine raw socket with IOHandler. >> > Can I open the socket when the session is opened and store in the >> session as >> > attachment and >> > write to that socket. >> > and then immediately wait for any response from the socket inputstream >> and >> > wrap it as bytebuffer and write it to session? >> > >> > is this a good approach? >> >> As I already commented in the JIRA issue you created, it's impossible >> with current JDK implementation. There's one alternative I can't >> think of if you want to use MINA with your use case for now: the >> implementation of blocking I/O based socket transport. You could >> contribute in this area, of course. > > I can't think of if -> I can think of is > > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ > -- > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6 > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Urgent-data-packet-tf4808974s16868.html#a13795830 Sent from the Apache MINA Support Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
