I am a committer and would suggest the trunk. While there has been alot of work lately (mostly the good work by Trustin), I have a great deal of confidence in the trunk and its ability to properly serve the community.
On Dec 12, 2007 2:47 PM, mclovis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > mclovis wrote: > > > > We currently have NIO server code working based on our own current > > design. Looking at the Mina code we feel we could simplify things > somewhat > > by switching to Mina. We are also currently in a refactoring phase. That > > being said it looks like you will release Mina2 -M1 soon and have > promised > > GA by summer. In your opinion, could we refactor to Mina1 for production > > quality and later upgrade with some changes to Mina2 , or wait to M2. If > > we are going to refactor using Mina in the near future, now is the time > > for us. I am posting this trying gain some understanding of Mina1 to > Mina2 > > features as well as compatibility. Any insights will be appreciated. > > > > If there are any code committers following this thread any insights from > them would also be appreciated. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Mina-1-vs-Mina-2-current-tp14296037s16868p14302489.html > Sent from the Apache MINA Support Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com > . > > -- -------------------------------- The adjuration to be "normal" seems shockingly repellent to me; I see neither hope nor comfort in sinking to that low level. I think it is ignorance that makes people think of abnormality only with horror and allows them to remain undismayed at the proximity of "normal" to average and mediocre. For surely anyone who achieves anything is, essentially, abnormal. Dr. Karl Menninger
