On Dec 14, 2007 2:05 AM, Luc Willems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 13 December 2007 03:50:14 Trustin Lee wrote: > > This issue is becoming a real headache even a bottle of tylenol can't > > fix, along with the reentrant logging issue: http://xrl.us/bctaa > > > > I think these two issues should be considered together to resolve the > > issues related with logging. Let me summarize current situation: > > > > 1) There are people (A) who don't want to use SLF4J but java.util.logging. > > 2) There are people (B) who like to use SLF4J and they say SLF4J > > supports java.util.logging along with log4j. > > 3) People A say java.util.logging can also do the same by employing a > > proper LogManager implementation. > > 4) There is a logger reentrance problem in MINA, which means it is > > difficult to write a MINA-based appender for the most logging > > frameworks that doesn't allow reentrance. This problem can be worked > > around by turning off logging in MINA, but this is not reasonable. > > to make the picture a bit "complexer" . there is also a dependancy > to apache commons-logging if you use the JMX classes. > > IoServiceBean depends on beanutils which uses commons-logging. > i don't know how "hard" this dependancy is to beanutils. if we could remove > this dependancy , it would reduce the dependancy list. > > It would be great that we had 1 logging framework to setup (which could be > used with JDK java.util.loggig or log4j)
I thought I got rid of that dependency recently, no? Thanks for the feed back anyway, Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
