Sounds like a good idea as long as it doesn't have any backward compatibility problem.
FYI, MINA has much better JMX integration in 2.0. Thanks, Trustin On Dec 26, 2007 6:17 PM, Cheng Lian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for all your hard work! I'm currently working with MINA 1.1.x, > Spring, JMX and Maven 2. Recently, I introduced MXBeans into my project > while I found out that Spring doesn't support MXBean well until the 2.5 > version. But Mina 1.1.x is depending on Spring 2.0.6, that really > causes some dependency management problems. > > I suggest that Mina can now depend on Spring 2.5 rather than 2.0.6, so > that dependency management will be easier. And mina-integration-jmx > users can also take advantages from JMX MXBeans. What's your opinons? > > Best regards > Cheng > > -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
