Hi Alan, Great to see you here btw. When Alan is interested in a project that only means it's going places :).
On Feb 9, 2008 3:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What should I use? I prefer the API from Geronimo but I see that it > doesn't get built in in Mina. I would also prefer to use Mina 1.x and > wait until Mina 2.x shakes itself out. > > So, I'm going to toss out the idea of releasing the new API as 1.0 and > we can release the new Mina 2.x based API as 2.0. Thoughts? > IMO I think looking ahead towards the use of MINA 2.0 is the best route here and it seems that people have already taken care of the merge. Perhaps there's some emails that you may have missed on the commits@ list and here. Mike already merged the two I think unless I'm mistaken which may be the case since I have been catching up as well. Oh and 1.0 whichever MINA it's based on makes sense to me but jumping to 2.0to denote the use of MINA 2.0 sounds good too. I just think we should stick to MINA 2.0 through and through because of the gains made therein. Regards, Alex
