이희승 (Trustin Lee) wrote:
Oh yeah, that's a good idea. We have been stepping on the accelerator
for a very long time to implement new features and improve performance,
so it seems like it's time to take care of stability.
I tink that MINA 2.0 is the perfect target for that ! Now that 2.0-M1
has been voted, we can deserve some energy on 2.0-M2 : a 2.0-M1 with
better coverage, reviewed documentation, tested, with some more
examples. It will cost time, but I'm sure that the community can provide
some help ! We have so many users now that everyone of them can also
give a little bit of time to improve MINA !
For instance, as we are using MINA at Directory, it would be good to
explain how we are using it (configuration and codec implementation). I
think that would be helpfull to many users starting with MINA. We will
switch to MINA 2.0 soon, and we will try to give such kind of
documentation to the MINA project on the same time.
One problem is that most bug reports these days are not easy to
reproduce, which means they are related with high concurrency situation
and unit tests cannot be the way to find many potential bugs, although
CircularQueue issue is probably detectable by a unit test.
That's true. May be we need some better FAQ for all the users who are
asking the same questions. Compiling the Users mailing list and
gathering the most frequent questions can help.
MINA 2.0 is really a great step forward, it deserves the associated
tests, doc and samples ! May be a "MINA in Action ?" :)
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
