Yep, that's it.
The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under 1.0
of it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId
of the new client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0
and written from "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
I think it's this:
http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We
discussed
making it a branch of asyncweb.
Thanks,
Sangjin
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Where do I look in the headers?
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승
(Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can re-read the
related thread?
Thanks,
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
The discussion that took place earlier was that this would be our
v1.0
release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I think it
still
needs to be put to a vote.
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희
승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the best way
to
merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
Rick McGuire wrote:
Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox appear to
have
settled down, so I think now would be a good time to move it to
the Mina
project if everybody agrees. Where would be the appropriate
place
to
put this client?
Rick
--
Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
