Just fixed it. Thanks for pointing that out. Regards, Sangjin
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:21 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One tiny issue: 1.0-SNAPSHOT should be 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT according to our > version numbering scheme: > > http://mina.apache.org/downloads.html#Downloads-VersionNumberingScheme > > Sangjin Lee wrote: > > The move is done... > > Thanks, > > Sangjin > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Sangjin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I began looking into this... Just to summarize what's going to happen > >> - The svn path under which the code will be moved is > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/asyncweb/branches/1.0/client(currentlythe > branches directory is empty). > >> - The code will be moved as is from the G sandbox, but the package will > be > >> renamed and refactored from org.apache.ahc.* to > >> org.apache.asyncweb.client.*. > >> - groupId: org.apache.asyncweb > >> - artifactId: asyncweb-client > >> - version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT > >> - name: AsyncHttpClient > >> > >> Please let me know if this is different than what you guys think... > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Sangjin > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:34 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Please go ahead and move it here. :) > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> Sangjin Lee wrote: > >>>> +1 > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Sangjin > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no > >>> 1.0 > >>>>> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId. > >>>>> > >>>>> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and > >>> is the > >>>>> reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice > >>> home > >>>>> here. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Alan > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same > artifactId > >>>>>> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth > transition > >>>>>> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think > >>> about > >>>>>> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine > >>> with > >>>>>> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite > >>> (i.e. > >>>>>> client + server) with the version number 2 after then. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home. > >>>>>>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when > >>> the > >>>>>>> new > >>>>>>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's > >>>>>>> built > >>>>>>> on MINA 2.0 goodness. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> Alan > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version? > >>> Or > >>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Alex > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Yep, that's it. > >>>>>>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it > under > >>>>>>>>> 1.0 of > >>>>>>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the > artifactId > >>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>> the new > >>>>>>>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and > >>>>>>>>> written > >>>>>>>>> from > >>>>>>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>> Alan > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I think it's this: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>> > http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We > >>>>>>>>>> discussed > >>>>>>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>> Sangjin > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera < > >>>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Where do I look in the headers? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>> Alan > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) < > >>>>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can > >>>>>>>>>>> re-read the > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> related thread? > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would > >>>>>>>>>>>> be our > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> v1.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I > >>>>>>>>>>>>> think it > >>>>>>>>>>>>> still > >>>>>>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> best way > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> appear > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> move it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Mina > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put this client? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hat > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/ > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>> -- > >>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > >>> -- > >>> what we call human nature is actually human habit > >>> -- > >>> http://gleamynode.net/ > >>> > >>> > > -- > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ > >
