Hi, We all know it's the current branche code ;)
Just checkout and test it ! Julien +1 for the release > I also like the idea of specifying the revision number for the releases... > Thanks, > Sangjin > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:14 AM, "ÀÌÈñ½Â (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> > Niklas Gustavsson wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:28 PM, "ÀÌÈñ½Â (Trustin Lee) >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> All fixes have been applied to both branch without any difference. >> The >> >>> two releases we are going to cut are basically backward-compatible >> bug >> >>> fix releases, so I don't see any reason to postpone them. >> >>> >> >>> Let's hope this is the last vote for 1.x releases. :) >> >>> >> >> >> >> Are the binaries available for review? If possible, I would prefer to >> >> be able to review the binaries before casting my vote. >> >> >> >> /niklas >> >> >> > Yeah, that would be cool to have. >> > >> > Also David Jencks on Directory project suggested that every vote >> should >> > be related to at least a revision number, otherwise we have no way to >> be >> > sure what we are working on. I know we never did it before, but I just >> > mention it because it seems sane to do so. >> > >> > wdyt ? >> >> Yeah, I also tried that approach once, but was too lazy to do it once >> again. :) Let me upload snapshot build and specify revision number >> soon... >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat >> -- >> what we call human nature is actually human habit >> -- >> http://gleamynode.net/ >> >> >
