Hi Daniel, Sound very cool ! I'm out for a week, but I can help you to test & integrate that in Asyncweb server when I'm back.
Julien On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 03:11:49 +0200 "Daniel Wirtz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I'm currently taking a deeper look into FastCGI on top of mina. I > built the basic FCGIEncoder, FCGIDecoder and a FCGICodecFactory with > performance in mind mostly using IoBuffers and stripping all the > needless stuff the original 12 years old devkit contains. Connections > can be used in both directions as client and/or server and there are > two modes implemented: A simple responder model utilizing FCGIRequest > and FCGIResponse that can be easily sent and later on received by an > IoHandler bypassing all the low level stuff by pre-assembling > FCGIPackets and also a low level mode to send and receive custom > FCGIPackets on your own (maybe for authorizer mode, you can even > mix). I'm currently working on a simple FCGIManager to easily spread > requests over multiple FastCGI backends - had this working once with > a good ol' threading model but then I decided to implement it > completely on top of Mina with a similar overall structure like > AsyncWeb. Think it would be a nice option to use PHP, Ruby etc. > backends for processing arbitrary stuff (quite similar to mod_fastcgi > in Apache and lighttpd). > > FCGIRequest request = new FCGIRequest(); > request.setProperties(....); > request.setStdin(...); > session.write(request); > -> messageReceived(...) retuns FCGIResponse containing Stdout, Stderr > byte arrays + AppStatus, ProtocolStatus, RequestId etc. or > alternatively a low level FCGIPacket depending on the CodecFactory > setting (e.g. new FCGICodecFactory(FCGIPacket.class / > FCGIResponse.class / FCGIRequest.class)). > > Tested it with PHP, works fine so far. > > Is there already a good FastCGI implementation available or is there > still a need for one? > > Regards > Daniel
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
