I mean that why doesn't garbage collector throw out of memory. I have a solution for this problem please pay attention to this solution because of this problem is very important: In ConcurrentLinkedQueue when a object insert to this queue an object of Node class is created and object insert to this Node object. In MINA2 in AbstractPollingIoProcessor class where flush() method call T session = flushingSessions.poll(); object is removed from queue but garbage collector can't throw out object of Node class from memory specially when about 600 message per second have to send and received by MINA2. So for this problem i replace PriorityBlockingQueue instead of ConcurrentLinkedQueue . I test this and operation Mina2 is correct I want to ask that this change is true or not. please answer to me.
In MINA2 in AbstractPollingIoProcessor class where private final Queue<T> flushingSessions =new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<T>(); instead of ConcurrentLinkedQueue --- On Sun, 4/27/08, Maziyar Eslamieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Maziyar Eslamieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: why ConcurrentLinkedQueue$node is wipe off from momory by garbage > collection? > To: [email protected] > Date: Sunday, April 27, 2008, 10:21 AM > please help me > > We have a sender and receiver server which uses MINA2. We > should send and receiver 600 message per second. As this > server receives messages , the number of > ConcurrentLinkedQueue$node object increases in memory. > I want to know why the number of this object increases and > why it is wipe off from momory by garbage collection? > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. > http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
