On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:13:09 +0900 (KST) "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone could post the IRC log (or link to it) just for the record. I > turned off logging because my HDD has only 32GB capacity and don't > know where the log is stored in FreeNode. > Here the logs : http://www.antwerkz.com/javabot/javabot/home/3/%23mina/2/29/1/04/0/2008/ Thanks to David :) Julien > "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" wrote: > > After long long IRC conversation with Emmanuel Lecharny, Julien > > Vermillard and David M. Lloyd. We seem to have reached to the > > following temporary consensus: > > > > 1) Ditch IoBuffer and use ByteBuffer directly. > > 2) Provide all convenience methods IoBuffer provide as static > > methods so they can be static-imported. > > 3) Modify our filter implementations to understand ByteBuffer and > > Iterable<ByteBuffer>. > > 4) Update the IoFilter tutorial to inform users about this change. > > > > This change means we decided not to create a new type to support > > composite buffer. Iterable<ByteBuffer> seems to be enough. > > > > This change will take place in a new branch and its review will be > > requested before merger. > > > > Another issue to think about is how we can implement auto-expansion. > > Many users find it very useful when they construct a variable length > > message. My idea right now is to provide a builder class which > > builds an Iterable<ByteBuffer> or ByteBuffer depending on user > > preference. Same preference property should be provided by the > > protocol codec framework for those who still wants a single > > ByteBuffer. I will also explore this in the branch. > > > > Any more feed back before I proceed? > > > > Cheers, >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
