Hi Trustin, Yes, I'm using MINA2, I'll try to edit it. By the way, is MINA2-m1 stable than MINA 1.x?
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:45 PM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you are using MINA 2, please take a look into > AbstractPollingIoProcessor.flush(). There's some lines commented out. You > could uncomment that block and give it a try. You can also provide us some > patch. It's open source at last. :) > > HTH, > > > On Thu, 29 May 2008 00:43:02 +0900, Owen Gu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, >> Thanks for your reply, I know a good framework will not expose the >> SocketChannel directly, I guess you could add some filter to solve the >> problem, could you tell me an approximate time I can get the low latency >> version, I don't want wait a long time, because it's a big problem for >> me:P, >> or could give me some hint so I can solve the problem by myself before I >> get >> the new version. >> >> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:26 PM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Owen, >>> >>> It's a known issue and should be dealt with before MINA 2 RC1. However, >>> we >>> should not expose SocketChannel directly - we should assure low latency >>> even >>> without doing so. >>> >>> HTH, >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 29 May 2008 00:15:02 +0900, Owen Gu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>>> A lot of our users complain about the latency problem, If mina could >>>> write >>>> the message directly before using a selector to dectect whether the >>>> SocketChannel could be written and when the message counln't be sent >>>> completly, using a selector to write the remaining messages, I think the >>>> latency problem will better than now. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat >>> -- >>> what we call human nature is actually human habit >>> -- >>> http://gleamynode.net/ >>> >>> > > > -- > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ >
