Julien Vermillard skrev:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:56:11 +0200
Niklas Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, you're right, it's a bit overkill to have an interface just to
avoid a cast. But SocketService still had its right to exist I think.
What if you want to explicitly depend on an IoService which handles
socket based transports? Removing SocketService means that one would
need to use IoService instead and then do the type checking at
runtime rather than at compile time.
/Niklas
You still got SocketAcceptor and SocketConnector, I don't see much
interest in a general SocketService iface with 2 methods.
I think you need to depend on a Socket based acceptor or
connector, not a SocketService no ?
Julien
You're probably right.
/Niklas
