On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:52:38 -0700 "Sangjin Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forgot to add that this is a pretty crucial method. Any text based > decoder would need to use it to decode messages... Thanks! > Sangjin > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Sangjin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've been looking at some performance characteristics of > > ByteBuffer.getString() in 1.1.x, and noticed that it is > > considerably slower than its NIO counterpart. I tested it with a > > few JVMs, and ByteBuffer.getString() performs anywhere between 3 - > > 5 times poorer than the NIO version. NIO does not have the > > getString() method, and one would use CharsetDecoder.decode(). > > I also checked the trunk version (IoBuffer.getString()), and it > > seems much faster and pretty close to the NIO performance. > > > > How is a performance issue with 1.1.x like this normally handled? > > Are we open to investigate and fix performance problems like this > > in 1.1.x as long as it does not entail API changes? If a simple > > change for IoBuffer resulted in this performance enhancement, > > perhaps we can backport that change? > > > > Thanks, > > Sangjin > > > > Hi Sangjin, I don't see any problem in patching 1.X for perfs. It's some kind of bugfix ;) Julien
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
