I'd say stick to the 72 hours. Rushing a release is seldom a good idea in my experience.
I haven't yet gotten around to finishing up on DIRMINA-608, but I see no problems pushing that to M4. Barend On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Julien Vermillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yep, and me to gather time and fix the distribution :) > Julien > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:47:04 -0400 > "Alex Karasulu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> +1 to releasing. Do we really have to cut down the 72 hrs? Might >> want to give some time for people to test it? >> >> Alex >> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >> >> > Julien Vermillard wrote: >> > >> >> Hi guys, >> >> >> >> 2.0.0-M2 release is suffering some serious issues : >> >> - DIRMINA-609 a big perf regression on big message (quite common) >> >> - the tarballs are fubared, you miss half of the modules >> >> >> >> I tihkn we need to redo a release soon (M3), specially for >> >> DIRMINA-609 >> >> >> >> WDYT ? >> >> >> >> >> > +1. >> > >> > You can launch a quick vote, and if the PMC aggreed on, we can even >> > shorten the 72 hours wait to something like 24hours, as we are now >> > on monday. That make sense for such a big regression. >> > >> > Otherwise, I also think that the Write issue should be addressed >> > correctly in 2.0.0-M4 : >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-577 >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-518 >> > >> > (more to come) >> > >> > Thanks ! >> > >> > -- >> > -- >> > cordialement, regards, >> > Emmanuel Lécharny >> > www.iktek.com >> > directory.apache.org >> > >> > >> > >> >> >
