Ok, I will let you finish that and I fire the vote Sunday (or Monday if
i'm too drunk ;)

Julien

On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:08:01 +0000 (GMT)
Edouard De Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1 
> also working on DIRMINA-519 will try to commit something before
> tomorrow night if i can, otherwise it will be addressed in 2.0.0 M3 
> 
>  Cordialement, Regards,
> -Edouard De Oliveira-
> http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Message d'origine ----
> De : Mark Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> À : [email protected]
> Envoyé le : Lundi, 28 Juillet 2008, 23h28mn 49s
> Objet : Re: releasing 2.0.0-M3 quickly
> 
> +1 Sounds fine with me.  I am still working on the composite buffer
> support, but I do not think that it is critical to get into a release
> right away.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:15 PM, W.B. Garvelink
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> 
> > I'd say stick to the 72 hours. Rushing a release is seldom a good
> > idea in my experience.
> >
> > I haven't yet gotten around to finishing up on DIRMINA-608, but I
> > see no problems pushing that to M4.
> >
> >
> > Barend
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Julien Vermillard
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > yep, and me to gather time and fix the distribution :)
> > > Julien
> > >
> > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:47:04 -0400
> > > "Alex Karasulu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 to releasing.  Do we really have to cut down the 72 hrs?
> > >> Might want to give some time for people to test it?
> > >>
> > >> Alex
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny
> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Julien Vermillard wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Hi guys,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 2.0.0-M2 release is suffering some serious issues :
> > >> >> - DIRMINA-609 a big perf regression on big message (quite
> > >> >> common)
> > >> >> - the tarballs are fubared, you miss half of the modules
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I tihkn we need to redo a release soon (M3), specially for
> > >> >> DIRMINA-609
> > >> >>
> > >> >> WDYT ?
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> > +1.
> > >> >
> > >> > You can launch a quick vote, and if the PMC aggreed on, we can
> > >> > even shorten the 72 hours wait to something like 24hours, as
> > >> > we are now on monday. That make sense for such a big
> > >> > regression.
> > >> >
> > >> > Otherwise, I also think that the Write issue should be
> > >> > addressed correctly in 2.0.0-M4 :
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-577
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-518
> > >> >
> > >> > (more to come)
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks !
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > --
> > >> > cordialement, regards,
> > >> > Emmanuel Lécharny
> > >> > www.iktek.com
> > >> > directory.apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 
>       
> _____________________________________________________________________________ 
> Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente
> http://mail.yahoo.fr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to